Goods & Services Tax
Service Tax Case Laws

Search ST Case Laws

Keyword

Authority

Court

Section

Appeal No.

Date of Order

Date of Order

Judge

Favouring

Login/Subscribe to get access. Plan starts from Rs. 3500/-  Subscribe Now

Court: CESTAT New Delhi Date of Order: 2020-10-21

An application has been filed with a prayer that the cross objection filed by the applicant in Service Tax Appeal filed by the Department may be permitted to be withdrawn


Court: CESTAT New Delhi Date of Order: 2020-10-21

An application has been filed with a prayer that the cross objection filed by the applicant in Service Tax Appeal filed by the Department may be permitted to be withdrawn


Court: CESTAT Ahmedabad Date of Order: 2020-10-20

After considering the submission made by both the sides, We find that since there is no regular cause list for hearing, even as per the guideline in public notice in a day four matters to be listed i.e only 20 cases in a week whereas, at present not more than four or five cases are listed in a week. In these circumstances, any early hearing application filed by either party needs to be considered leniently.


Court: CESTAT New Delhi Date of Order: 2020-10-19

It is stated by the learned Counsel of the appellant that the amount of Rs. 50,000/- that was required to be deposited under the order dated August 11, 2020 has actually been deposited but learned Counsel seeks time to submit proof of this deposit.


Court: CESTAT Mumbai Date of Order: 2020-10-19

Applicant has filed this miscellaneous application, seeking for early hearing of appeal. The ground urged in support of early hearing seems reasonable. Accordingly, in the interest of justice, the miscellaneous application is allowed. Registry is directed to list the appeal for final hearing on 20.10.2020.


Court: CESTAT Kolkata Date of Order: 2020-10-14

In view of the reasons as mentioned in the applications and the submissions as made by the learned Counsel for the applicants/appellants, the Miscellaneous Applications for out-of-turn hearing of the appeals are allowed. List the appeals tomorrow i.e. on 15.10.2020.


Court: CESTAT Mumbai Date of Order: 2020-10-13

The sample of goods available with the Commissioner of Customs, Nhava Sheva or in its absence fresh sample be collected and sent to the BIS Authority at the cost of the appellant, as has been agreed by him, for examination and report to be submitted preferably within two months from receipt of this order. Clarity on description of imported goods be reflected in the report since the appellant claims that it had imported LED modules and wrongly described it in the bill of entry as LED lighting chains. Appellant is also directed to co-operate the JNCH Customs Authority in the entire process. Extract of this order be sent to the Commissioner of Nhava Sheva forthwith.


Court: CESTAT Kolkata Date of Order: 2020-10-12

In view of the submissions as made by the learned Chartered Accountant, the early hearing of the appeal is allowed and the appeal is listed for hearing on 14 October 2020.


Court: CESTAT New Delhi Date of Order: 2020-10-12

The applicant understands that the appeal has to be heard before the Mumbai Bench of the Tribunal but what has been stated is that since the appellant is residing at Delhi, it will not be possible for the applicant to frequently visit Mumbai to consult the Counsel in case the hearing takes place at Mumbai.


Court: CESTAT Chandigarh Date of Order: 2020-10-09

In view of the above discussions and the clear provisions of Section 35D (3) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, it is clear that the Single Member Bench of this Tribunal is having the jurisdiction to decide the issue of interest irrespective of monetary limit. The objections raised by the Revenue are answered that the Single Member Bench of this Tribunal is having the jurisdiction to decide the issue of interest irrespective of any amount.